When? What? Why?

When I was a kid growing up we didn’t have hyphenated citizenship. We were all Americans. We still don’t, for the majority, have hyphenated citizenship. It appears, however, if you are a citizen whose ancestry was based in Africa you are a hyphenated citizen. You are not American, you are an African-American. How many really want to be hyphenated Americans. If an article is written about Joan Chen, Ben Murphy, Jimmy Stewart, Glenn Beck, Rudy Giuliani, etc. they are not given hyphenated citizenship. In fact nothing is usually mentioned about their historic ancestry. But, if an American happens to have an African ancestry they become hyphenated. Isn’t that racist in itself? Doesn’t this create more stratification of the populace?

We recently saw a college age female giving a speech about how she was trilingual. She could speak english, as well as two English based dialects that anyone who was not of African heritage (her fore bearers were brought to America in the 1700’s) or from the “hood” would probably not understand. She felt that she should be able to converse with her college professors, other students, and others in these dialects as her heritage was ripped from her. Most people with her background forget that their heritage wasn’t the only one ripped away. Many of the early European settlers of America did not come over willingly. While it is easy to state that many of African heritage came to America as slaves many of those of European ancestry also came over in a slave type situation. Those who were found guilty of crimes were sent over against their will. Many became “bond” servants (a form of slavery) to get away from repressive situations. And the list goes on.

Those who feel their heritage was ripped from them need to take a look at the history of the country of their ancestors and consider whether they would have been better off if their ancestors had remained. I’m sure that those from many African countries may not have survived to adulthood or their ancestors may have been slaves of another tribe. Those who had ancestors from European countries may have been executed or died of disease or starvation.

So, stop and think what was happening in the world at the time and consider what your family’s fate may have been if your ancestors had continued in their homeland.

Also, those of African heritage need to consider the great history the people of color played in the building of America. It wasn’t until the early 20th century that this history was obliterated by President Wilson, one of the pre-eminent racists of this country. As an example, in the painting of Washington crossing the Delaware there is a black man manning one of the oars. Was he a slave? No. He was a soldier serving under General Washington as were the others in the boat. They probably were of officer rank as the general would have wanted to keep his advisers close. Another is a painting of General Lafayette, who came from France as an advisor to the Army of the Republic, which shows a black man holding the reins of a horse. Most look at that picture and think he was one of the servants assigned to the General. They would be mistaken. He was a high ranking officer in the fledgling army. The heritage was there. It has just been swept under the rug by politicians.

The Speech That Hasn’t Been Given But Should

by Robert Prechter

To the students and faculty of our high school:

I am your new principal, and honored to be so. There is no greater calling than to teach young people.

I would like to apprise you of some important changes coming to our school. I am making these changes because I am convinced that most of the ideas that have dominated public education in America have worked against you, against your teachers and against our country.

First, this school will no longer honor race or ethnicity. I could not care less if your racial makeup is black, brown, red, yellow or white. I could not care less if your origins are African, Latin American, Asian or European, or if your ancestors arrived here on the Mayflower or on slave ships.

The only identity I care about, the only one this school will recognize, is your individual identity — your character, your scholarship, your humanity. And the only national identity this school will care about is American. This is an American public school, and American public schools were created to make better Americans.

If you wish to affirm an ethnic, racial or religious identity through school, you will have to go elsewhere. We will end all ethnicity-, race- and non-American nationality-based celebrations. They undermine the motto of America, one of its three central values — e pluribus unum, “from many, one.” And this school will be guided by America’s values.

This includes all after-school clubs. I will not authorize clubs that divide students based on any identities. This includes race, language, religion, sexual orientation or whatever else may become in vogue in a society divided by political correctness.

Your clubs will be based on interests and passions, not blood, ethnic, racial or other physically defined ties. Those clubs just cultivate narcissism — an unhealthy preoccupation with the self — while the purpose of education is to get you to think beyond yourself. So we will have clubs that transport you to the wonders and glories of art, music, astronomy, languages you do not already speak, carpentry and more. If the only extracurricular activities you can imagine being interesting in are those based on ethnic, racial or sexual identity, that means that little outside of yourself really interests you.

Second, I am uninterested in whether English is your native language. My only interest in terms of language is that you leave this school speaking and writing English as fluently as possible. The English language has united America’s citizens for over 200 years, and it will unite us at this school. It is one of the indispensable reasons this country of immigrants has always come to be one country. And if you leave this school without excellent English language skills, I would be remiss in my duty to ensure that you will be prepared to successfully compete in the American job market. We will learn other languages here — it is deplorable that most Americans only speak English — but if you want classes taught in your native language rather than in English, this is not your school.

Third, because I regard learning as a sacred endeavor, everything in this school will reflect learning’s elevated status. This means, among other things, that you and your teachers will dress accordingly. Many people in our society dress more formally for Hollywood events than for church or school. These people have their priorities backward. Therefore, there will be a formal dress code at this school.

Fourth, no obscene language will be tolerated anywhere on this school’s property — whether in class, in the hallways or at athletic events. If you can’t speak without using the f-word, you can’t speak. By obscene language I mean the words banned by the Federal Communications Commission, plus epithets such as “Nigger,” even when used by one black student to address another black, or “bitch,” even when addressed by a girl to a girlfriend. It is my intent that by the time you leave this school, you will be among the few your age to instinctively distinguish between the elevated and the degraded, the holy and the obscene. Fifth, we will end all self-esteem programs. In this school, self-esteem will be attained in only one way — the way people attained it until decided otherwise a generation ago — by earning it. One immediate consequence is that there will be one valedictorian, not eight.

Sixth, and last, I am reorienting the school toward academics and away from politics and propaganda. No more time will devoted to scaring you about smoking and caffeine, or terrifying you about sexual harassment or global warming. No more semesters will be devoted to condom wearing and teaching you to regard sexual relations as only or primarily a health issue. There will be no more attempts to convince you that you are a victim because you are not white, or not male, or not heterosexual or not Christian. We will have failed if any one of you graduates this school and does not consider him or herself inordinately lucky — to be alive and to be an American.

Now, please stand and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of our country. As many of you do not know the words, your teachers will hand them out to you.

Latest Polls At A Glance

from CBS News

Party Support

Voters Trust - Who Will Do the Better Job

Congressional Job Approval

Obama’s approval ratings vs. George W. Bush At Comparable Points in Presidency

Ratings Compared to Other Recent Two-term Presidents At Comperal Points in Presidency

Obama’s Ratings


ESPN poll: 71% support the Redskins keeping their name.
This includes a whopping 53 percent of liberals, despite a non-stop smear campaign against the team.  
Here’s a question for you: if “Redskins” is racist, why isn’t “The Fighting Irish.” That mascot and team name promotes ridiculous ethnic stereotypes, but I don’t see any liberals on TV promoting the boycott of Notre Dame football. 
If you don’t like the team name, don’t watch the games.  It’s a simple as that. 


ESPN poll: 71% support the Redskins keeping their name.

This includes a whopping 53 percent of liberals, despite a non-stop smear campaign against the team.  

Here’s a question for you: if “Redskins” is racist, why isn’t “The Fighting Irish.” That mascot and team name promotes ridiculous ethnic stereotypes, but I don’t see any liberals on TV promoting the boycott of Notre Dame football. 

If you don’t like the team name, don’t watch the games.  It’s a simple as that. 

Is President Obama An Agent For Islamists The Way King Edward VIII Was For The Nazis?

by John Myers

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” — Barack Obama “The two people who have caused me the most trouble in my life are Wallis Simpson and Hitler.” — Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother Islam is becoming more extreme with each passing year and with only token impediment from President Barack Obama. I believe the president is either naïve or he is purposely helping Islamic aspirations for global domination. That there is something wrong at the White House is becoming apparent in the wake of the cancer that can be seen in the growing violence in the Middle East by the Islamic State. The terrorist group also known as ISIS or ISIL is a cancer that is a long-term threat to all of us. It is a cancer whose virility can be diagnosed by the gruesome beheading of American photojournalist James Foley, reportedly by a born and bred Englishman who joined ISIS and is now a wanted traitor. Still, apologists say this and every other terror attack and broadcast execution have nothing to do with Islam. Rather, such acts are the work of terrorists or — as former President George W. Bush called the 9/11 terrorists — “evildoers.” News flash: Islam at its marrow is the evildoer. It isn’t because the majority of Muslims are involved in a global jihad. In truth, they are a very small minority. Instead, it’s because more than 90 percent of Muslims refuse to speak out against the barbaric goals of the terrorists in their ranks. In many ways radical Islam is no different than Nazism of the 1930s. But rather than a single race following the evil edict of Adolf Hitler, evil and radical Islam is driven by millions of Muslims following the teachings of the Quran. Liberalism brings with it an army of appeasers. In the late 1930s, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and America’s ambassador to Britain, Joseph Kennedy, thought Hitler was a leader they could work with. Certainly, most of the 40 million Germans didn’t want war. When the Nazi leadership pressed it upon them, a small minority protested and many were exterminated. World War III may have commenced, and the apologists are doing their utmost to deny the fact that radical Islam has its sights set not only on the domination of the Middle East but also on — within the next half century — the world. In an interview with Mike Huckabee, author Joel Richardson said the number of radical Muslims is as high as 250 million. They are soulless when it comes to murder and mayhem against Western democratic nations. That is a quarter of a billion people spread around the world — some likely living not far from you, some hoping for the death and destruction of “nonbelievers” as is proclaimed in the Quran. This idea that Islam is a peace-loving religion — as expressed by Bush and emphasized by a man I consider to be a Muslim, Obama — puts America in grave jeopardy. I believe that Islam is as evil and an even greater world threat to free thought than Nazism. Radical Muslims are fighting a guerrilla war in which thousands, and sometimes millions, of Islamic zealots become more radical each year and more willing to take up arms against the very peoples who provide them freedom and comfort. Two hundred and fifty million Muslims are devoted not to a man and twisted hate and political dogma but to their god, their prophet and even their imam. To go against them and the Quran does not risk jail or even execution but the eternal damnation of hellfire. The Traitor King

If I ever get to the pearly gates and meet Saint Peter and if I am able to get past all my sins, he might ask me what my area of expertise was. I will not say investing or energy or writing, I will say the era of World War II because I have soaked it in all my life through writings and interviews with men of both sides of the European theater of war. Yet one evening, as I watched a documentary titled “Britain’s Nazi King,” I realized how little of that time period I really understood. According to a respected production company, King Edward VIII and his consort, Wallis Simpson, corresponded openly with the Nazi hierarchy and even knew of Hitler’s plan to restore him as the rightful king after the Germans invaded and occupied England. This all happened as Ambassador Kennedy and many others on both sides of the Atlantic believed the defeat of England was fait accompli.

My wife, born in England and a royalist to her core, was out the evening I watched “Britain’s Nazi King.” When she returned home, I told her what I had just watched. She looked at me as if I had completely cracked up. I didn’t raise the subject again but read much more about it, including how Prime Minister Winston Churchill told one confidant that he believed Edward and Simpson should be shot as traitors. My wife was shocked when a National Geographic program came on TV regarding the traitorous acts of Edward, especially when she realized that it took five decades before this revelation had been revealed by declassified FBI files.

My wife — just as my English mother — had always believed that the king had abdicated the throne simply because he wanted to marry an American divorcee. That was hardly so, as it turned out. Allied intelligence had a huge case file on Edward and Simpson. Luckily, Edward had only ceremonial powers. He did not in any way direct the government or the political decisions made by Great Britain. What if Edward had been an imperial king with immense powers? What if he had not only had dictatorial control of the empire but also a group of loyalists in his court that would have done anything to protect him? What if the aristocracy had been fully invested in him? If that had been the case, I dare say I would be writing these words to you in German. What Did The President Know And When Did He Know It?

What if there is even a small chance that Obama is loyal to the Quran and Islam? Does that sound crazy? It’s no crazier than Edward being the Nazi king. And even if there is one chance in 10 that Obama is loyal to the Quran and Islam, it deserves consideration because Islam may be a nemesis to the West.

Factor in that there is only one chance in 100 that I am correct of the threat of Islam. Do you want to see your nation destroyed, your values upended, over one chance in a 100? Millions of people play the lottery for one chance in a million. And if a doctor said you have a 1 percent chance of having terminal cancer, how upset would you feel? I feel very upset. Maybe you and I face only a one in 100 chance of Islam obliterating us, our children and our grandchildren. But even at that, I don’t like those odds. I can only hope I am dead wrong and not a dead infidel.

VA - There are two very good videos on YouTube regarding the Nazi King. John Myers shouldn’t even be asking the question in his headline. What else could the muslim boy be but an agent for Islamists. He has shown that side throughout his tenure.

from The Islamic Counterterrorism Institute

Slick Willy Says He Could Have Killed Osama bin Laden - But Didn’t

from Steve

In a newly released recording, Bill Clinton said that there was a point in time when he could have killed the notorious terrorist leader Osama bin Laden, but decided not to because innocent civilians might have been injured or killed.

In an audio recording delivered to Australian businessmen, he said he had carefully considered his decision to let bin Laden go.

In Clinton’s own words:

I’m just saying, you know, if I were Osama bin Laden – he’s a very smart guy, I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about him, and I nearly got him once.

I nearly got him. And I could have killed him, but I would have to destroy a little town called Kandahar in Afghanistan and kill 300 innocent women and children, and then I would have been no better than him.

And so I didn’t do it.

The strange part: This recording was made Sep. 10th, 2001, the day before the 9/11 attacks.

Do you think Clinton was telling the truth when he said this?

Obama: ISIS is a “manageable problem.” We need to “organize the Arab world.”



So, how does a community organizer respond to the biggest terrorist threat facing our country?  We need to organize it, of course!

Here’s the video:

He’s not a Commander in Chief.  He is a community organizer, and that’s all he knows how to do.

The Global Map, 2017

by Ben Shapiro

Barack Obama pledged to radically transform America when he took office. He didn’t stop at America. President Obama’s greatest legacy may be the radical reshaping of the global map.

Fast forward three years. Here’s where we [will] stand:

Given Europe’s failure to stand up to Russian aggression in Crimea, Russia’s borders have expanded to include Eastern Ukraine, northern Kazakhstan and larger portions of Moldova. As of 2014, Russia had consolidated its hold on Transnistria, the Eastern region of Moldova, which is heavily Russian; Russia had annexed Crimea; Russia had placed troops inside Eastern Ukraine.

But it didn’t stop there. Russia began squeezing Georgia again, and pro-Russian regimes are consolidating their power in Kazakhstan and Belarus. Belarus asked the Russian government to place 15 warplanes inside the country in 2014; Kazakhstan got into a tiff with Russia over comments Putin made unsubtly suggesting a possible invasion of the country, then complied with Putin’s demands when the West did nothing.

Thus far, Putin has not invaded any NATO countries. But that could change, given the high Russian population in Latvia and Estonia.

Meanwhile, in the Middle East, Jordan’s kingdom has fallen, replaced by a radical Islamist regime. That Palestinian Arab regime has attempted to consolidate its power by forming an alliance with Hamas in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza. In Lebanon, the Iranians and Syrians have effectively annexed southern Lebanon. Israel’s only quiet border is now its southern border with Egypt.

In Syria, Bashar Assad has retained a measure of power by essentially conceding territory to ISIS in the eastern part of the country; after a halfhearted intervention against ISIS, the international community went quiet as ISIS formed its sought-after caliphate in eastern Syria and northern Iraq. In response, Iran essentially invaded southern Iraq, and Turkey launched covert action against the Kurds in order to prevent the formation of a broader Kurdistan encompassing parts of Turkish territory.

With the withdrawal of the United States and its allies from Afghanistan, Pakistan has once again made its presence felt. The Taliban have effectively taken control of large swaths of territory, with the help of the Pakistani regime, which has shifted leadership but not position with regard to radical Islam.

In the most stunning international move, China has threatened full-scale annexation of Taiwan, barring access to the South China Sea from Western countries and cutting off Taiwan’s trade routes. The West has refused to leverage China, fearing financial retaliation. China has made similar moves against the Philippines.

Come 2017, this will be President Obama’s legacy: a world of redrawn borders, all to the benefit of some of the worst regimes on the planet. When America retreats from the world, its enemies expand.

VA - This is almost the same prediction Glenn Beck made three or more years ago regarding the move by the Muslims to a restore its Caliphate of old.

ISIS Displaying a Deft Command of Varied Media

by Scot Shane and Ben Hubbard

The extremists who have seized large parts of Syria and Iraq have riveted the world’s attention with their military prowess and unrestrained brutality. But Western intelligence services are also worried about their extraordinary command of seemingly less lethal weapons: state-of-the-art videos, ground images shot from drones and multilingual Twitter messages.

ISIS, the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, is using every contemporary mode of messaging to recruit fighters, intimidate enemies and promote its claim to have established a caliphate, a unified Muslim state run according to a strict interpretation of Islamic law.

Read More HERE

VA - They must be taking lessons from their big brother b.o. Sounds like the same thing he did to take the US presidency captive so he could behead the country. They all must have gone to his “Community Organizer 101” classes.